Defining My Role as a Researcher
Another
interesting topic that arose during last night’s Skype call was defining our
role as a researcher. Helen clarified this excellently and I am much more aware
on the tasks at hand following the discussion on the matter.
Harry and I
expressed the issue that no one else has written about specifically our inquiry
topics; they have written about things relating to it but not the specifics.
Helen advised that the fact that we aren’t finding the stuff in between the
literature and researcher is actually a good thing as it is that stuff in
between that we are looking to develop for our own research.
‘It’s you
as the researcher that makes those links, fills those gaps and that looks at
the relationships between the literature that’s already out there and what you’re
perceiving and experiencing in your own practice. Acknowledging that there is
literature in these two areas and acknowledging that what you’re proposing to
do straddles these two areas.’ Helen.
This helped
to define my role as the researcher as it is to make those connections in order
to give me something to write about in my inquiry. I will be looking at the relationship, what it is and what I am experiencing as well as what I am reading that’s
already published.
There is a very definitive role as a
researcher. It is not to tick off what’s already there, but it is to look for
the gaps and how what I am proposing made me fill some of those gaps. In the
bigger scheme of things, I am looking at what contribution I am making to this
field in terms of research.
Comments
Post a Comment